The approved change stays with the installation.
Connecting drawing review with real-time field guidance. Drawing review and crew guidance are usually two separate jobs with a gap between them; Screwge keeps them on one task record.
Equipment against installation conditions
The review compares the equipment with the actual project context, including verified site information.
Findings with their sources
A reviewer can inspect the drawing regions, revisions and measurements behind a finding.
Engineering decisions connected to crew tasks
The resolution stays attached to the equipment and installation location.
Revision changes remain visible
An affected task is flagged when new information changes the applicable instruction.
How a pilot is evaluated
A pilot compares consequential mismatches found, false alerts and total engineering review effort against your existing process. It also checks whether crews actually use the approved information.
Better performance and lower review effort are the result the pilot is designed to establish — not a claim we make in advance.
Starting with electrical. Scaling across construction.
Switchboard revisions and replacements are the initial focus because the mismatch is concrete, the sources are known and the engineer’s decision is clear. Transformers and generators are future equipment categories.
The task record — equipment tag, location, approved revision — is not specific to electrical work, which is how the same workflow extends to other trades once the electrical checks have proved themselves.
Evaluated against your own process.
- Consequential mismatches found — the ones that would have cost rework.
- False alerts — findings the engineer dismissed, and why.
- Total engineering review effort — compared with how the same package is reviewed today.
- Crew use of approved information — whether the foreman actually retrieved the current detail.
Discuss pilot scope
One revised switchboard package is enough to compare the review with your existing process.